Table of Contents

Phytoremediation - and other techniques for using life to remediate contaminated sites

Cleaning up these sites is challenging and expensive.

I also want to note up-front that though I've done my best to get this information correct, I'm in no ways an expert on phytoremediation, bioremediation, environmental restoration, chemistry, botany, or biology. The topics covered here involve a wide range of hazardous substances and practices for cleaning them up, but done incorrectly this stuff can kill you fast or slow! Please do not treat this research as real-life cleanup advice without vetting it with someone who actually knows what they're talking about.

What is Phytoremediation

Phytoremediation is the practice of using living plants to clean soil, air and water by absorbing or breaking down hazardous contaminants.

Plants can help clean up many types of contaminants including heavy metals, pesticides, explosives, and oil. However, they work best where contaminant levels are low because high concentrations may limit plant growth and take too long to clean up. Plants can also help prevent wind, rain, and groundwater flow from carrying contaminants away from the site to surrounding areas or deeper underground.

At its core principle, phytoremediation focuses on the ability of some plants to uniquely tolerate environmental pollutants.

Defining Contaminated Sites

Contaminated sites are places where the soil, water, air, plants, or some combination have

Specifics are obviously going to vary based on where your story is set - different legal systems, unions, nations, provinces, states, even municipalities will have their own lists of which contaminants they track, the levels they consider concerning vs safe, and proper response procedures.

https://www.epa.gov/superfund/contaminants-superfund-sites

Types of Contaminants and Where They Come From

One thing I've realized while working on these projects: there are no neat lists of every dangerous substance. Even the lists of what this or that country or organization tracks are frequently asterisk'ed with entries including entire families of thousands of related chemicals, definitional nuances, and notes on how the dose makes the poison - and those lists are often incomplete themselves!

Nonetheless, and with the confidence of the layman, I've attempted to break the most common and dangerous contaminants into the following broad categories:

Heavy Metals / Toxic Metals

A heavy metal is a metal-like element noted for its potential toxicity, such as cadmium, lead, and mercury. While trying to find a full list of heavy metals for this page, I learned that there's some disagreement on the terminology around 'heavy metals' as being misleading or meaningless (not all heavy metals are toxic and some toxic metals are not elementally heavy), and that some people prefer 'toxic metals' which probably does the job better. That said, I've been reading papers on phytoremediation and environmental restoration for two years now without noticing the dispute, so 'heavy metal' still seems to be a good search term in this context.

It's also worth noting that some of these metals are nutritionally essential for animal or plant life but are considered toxic in high doses or other forms.

Entries with * are from the EPA Clean Water Act's list of Priority Pollutants. Entries with a ^ are RCRA-8 (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) metals.

Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)

POPs are a broad category of organic compounds that are toxic, adversely affecting human health or the environment. They are persistent in the environment and able to last for years before breaking down. They're both very able to spread far from their source, and to bioaccumulate in fatty tissue in humans and other animals.

You can find a good deal of information on them at this page which is (at time of writing, Feb 2026) still maintained by the EPA. This similar writeup by the UN provides more information on the Caribbean.

Put simply, POPs are a long list of chemicals produced for various industrial and household practices, or by accident as other chemicals broke down or interacted in the environment. They are tracked by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Stockholm Convention - the original 12 POPs are often called the Dirty Dozen but more have been added since. They include the following, though it's worth noting that some of these are basically entire categories or broad suites of similar chemicals themselves:

The Stockholm Convention site and Wikipedia both have full lists of the POPs which have been added since 2001. As many of them are pesticides (and many of the above are pesticides) I thought I'd limit the ones I include here to other sources just to show the range of sources.

PFAS (Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances)

PFAS are another broad category of manufactured chemicals that have been used in industry and consumer products since the 1940s. I often see them mentioned separately from POPs but many of them (such as PFOS and PFOA) are also persistent organic pollutants. There are thousands of different PFAS, some of which have been more widely used and studied than others. PFAS have been used in a wide variety of products including waterproof fabrics, nonstick pans, athletic clothing, carpets, shampoo, mobile phones, paint, furniture, adhesives, food packaging, firefighting foam, electrical insulation, and cosmetics.

Often called “forever chemicals”, PFAS move through soils and bioaccumulate in fish and wildlife, which are then eaten by humans. Residues are now commonly found in soil, rain, drinking water, and wastewater. Due to the large number of PFAS, it is challenging to assess the potential human health and environmental risks but some are known to be carcinogens or endocrine disruptors, and exposure to them has been linked to diseases and health conditions including cancers, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease, suboptimal antibody response or decreased immunit.

This page by the EPA is still an excellent resource at time of writing. The wikipedia page is also quite useful.

Organophosphate Esters (OPEs)

OPEs are a functional group of similar chemicals found in Pesticides, Flame retardants, Plasticisers, Metal extractants, Surfactants, Nerve agents, Hydraulic fluids and lubricant additives. These compounds are highly toxic, show environmental persistence and accumulation, and contribute to numerous cases of poisoning and death each year. Like PFAS and phthalates, human exposure to OPEs appears widespread, originating from numerous products, the environment, and food. Their environmental persistence and toxicity raise serious concerns and their wide-scale dissemination as agricultural products has led to environmental accumulation and toxification of soil and water across the globe. They have been detected in the air as far away as Antarctica.

Depending on the nature of the exposure and the specific compound in question, OPEs have been linked to potentially adverse impacts on multiple human organ systems, including the respiratory, gastrointestinal, central nervous system, cardiovascular, and renal systems.

This category may overlap with some of the above, I'm not sure. At one time OPEs were considered to be a good alternative for the widely used polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), which were listed as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) by the Stockholm Convention.

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

Many VOCs are human-made chemicals that are used and produced in the manufacture of paints, pharmaceuticals, and refrigerants. VOCs typically are industrial solvents, such as trichloroethylene; fuel oxygenates, such as methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE); or by-products produced by chlorination in water treatment, such as chloroform. VOCs are often components of petroleum fuels, hydraulic fluids, paint thinners, and dry cleaning agents. VOCs are common ground-water contaminants.

VOCs are emitted by a wide array of products numbering in the thousands. Examples include: paints and lacquers, paint strippers, cleaning supplies, pesticides, building materials and furnishings, office equipment such as copiers and printers, correction fluids and carbonless copy paper, graphics and craft materials including glues and adhesives, permanent markers, and photographic solutions. Organic chemicals are widely used as ingredients in household products. Paints, varnishes, and wax all contain organic solvents, as do many cleaning, disinfecting, cosmetic, degreasing, and hobby products. Fuels are made up of organic chemicals. All of these products can release organic compounds while you are using them, and, to some degree, when they are stored.

Concentrations of many VOCs are consistently higher indoors (up to ten times higher) than outdoors.

VOCs include a variety of chemicals, some of which may have short- and long-term adverse health effects. The ability of organic chemicals to cause health effects varies greatly from those that are highly toxic to those with no known health effects. As with other pollutants, the extent and nature of the health effect will depend on many factors including level of exposure and length of time exposed. Eye and respiratory tract irritation, headaches, dizziness, visual disorders, and memory impairment are among the immediate symptoms that some people have experienced soon after exposure to some organics.

Health effects include eye, nose, and throat irritation; headaches, loss of coordination, nausea, hearing disorders and damage to the liver, kidney, and central nervous system. Some VOCs are suspected or known to cause cancer in humans. Key signs or symptoms associated with exposure to VOCs include conjunctival irritation, nose and throat discomfort, headache, allergic skin reaction, dyspnea, declines in serum cholinesterase levels, nausea, vomiting, nose bleeding, fatigue, dizziness.

Asbestos

Asbestos is a group of naturally occurring, toxic and carcinogenic, fibrous silicate minerals, used for thousands of years for their fire-resistant and insulating properties. The visible fibers are themselves each composed of millions of microscopic “fibrils” that can be released by abrasion and other processes. Sometimes called the Miracle Mineral, Asbestos' ability to form a fireproof fabric made it useful in a variety of applications. These included thousands of materials in the construction industry such as fire-retardant coatings, concrete, bricks, pipes and fireplace cement, heat-, fire-, and acid-resistant gaskets, pipe insulation, ceiling insulation, fireproof drywall, flooring, roofing, sprayed coatings, pipe insulation, and Asbestos Insulating Board (AIB), and drywall joint compound. It also saw use in friction products such as automobile clutch, brake, and transmission parts. As well as general use in heat-resistant fabrics, packaging, gaskets, and coatings, even lawn furniture.

Some applications are considered to be more dangerous than others due to the amount of asbestos in the product and the material's friable nature.

Exposure to asbestos increases your risk of developing lung disease, such as lung cancer, mesothelioma, a rare form of cancer that is found in the thin lining of the lung, chest and the abdomen and heart, and asbestosis, a serious progressive, long-term, non-cancer disease of the lungs.

Compared to the impact on humans, the environmental pollution potential of asbestos products is often overlooked. Asbestos fibers are diverse in their physicochemical properties, and this diversity has a significant influence on their behavior in the environment. Recent research has confirmed that asbestos can be transported by water and spread to other parts of the environment.

Radioactive Contamination

Humans have been tinkering with radioactive substances for over a hundred years, often following insufficient safety practices. Sites can and have been contaminated through the mining, transportation, and refinement of materials for nuclear power, by the production of nuclear weapons, by the disposal of medical equipment and treatment solutions, and even by civilian factories which used radioactive materials, including radium and tritium, in manufacturing commercial products. Depending on the type of facility and the type of radiation released, contamination could be found in air, soil, liquids, or on equipment.

The following US EPA resource is still quite helpful if you need more information: https://www.epa.gov/radtown/radioactively-contaminated-sites

Existing Site Remediation Procedures

When it comes to cleaning up contaminated sites, phytoremediation is one of several options, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Many of these practices are more invasive and expensive, but they're likely not going away, even if phytoremediation continues to improve. For sites which are badly contaminated, or which have multiple co-contaminants in one place, or where the cleanup is urgent to prevent further spread or to protect human communities, the most straightforward solution is going to remain digging out it out and remediating it elsewhere, under controlled conditions.

Physical Methods:

Chemical Methods:

Safety note: It's important to remember that working on contaminated sites is dangerous and requires appropriate precautions. Depending on the contamination and state of the site, just walking around can be dangerous, and the remediations outlined above generally involve disturbing the site by digging up soil, which will lead to airborne dust and other increased risks of exposure. Dust control, PPE such as masks, even hazmat suits and self-contained air supplies can be necessary onsite.

Types of Phytoremediation

Phytoaccumulation/Phytoextraction

In some ways this is one of the more intuitive ways to clean up a site. Why dig out all the contaminated soil, transport it, and clean it, when you can grow plants that will extract the contaminant and then simply remove the plant.

Phytomining

Phytomining, also known as Agromining, is another quite new field, looking to obtain various metals for industrial purposes using plants. It is currently the subject of several research studies and startups, including ones attempting to genetically modify more effective plants, and it seems like its overall viability is still undetermined at this time.

It is included in this list because the harvested hyperaccumulators need to be sent somewhere for containment, and it's possible that any industrial experience gleaned in commercial phytomining work will be useful in separating the contaminants from the plant matter. This would be ideal because reducing the mass of organic matter needing long-term storage will reduce both waste and cost. It may even be able to turn a waste product into a useful input in industry as many heavy metals have manufacturing uses.

Phytovolatilization

Some plants take up contaminants from the soil and release them into the atmosphere - this is known as Phytovolatilization. This can be a good thing, such as when the contaminant is something like Dioxane which can be photodegraded and has a half-life measured in hours to days when exposed to sunlight but it can also be a problem, like when the contaminant is a heavy metal. Aerosolized mercury may be enough of a hazard to rule out some phytoremediation candidates. So far it seems like most of the time when I see phytovolatilization mentioned in a phytoremediation paper the authors are treating a low phytovolatilization rate as being a good thing but it definitely varies by contaminant.

Rhizofiltration

Phytostabilization

This title seems to encompass two different processes with similar results. The first is when plants change the soil's physical and chemical properties, making it less suitable for contaminant leaching. The second is when the plants take up contaminants but trap them in their roots to protect themselves. Obviously this would make it challenging to remove the contaminated plant matter from the site as you would with hyperaccumulators, but it does have the effect of stopping the contaminant from spreading or migrating underground.

Phytodegradation/bioremediation

Out of all these options, this is probably the closest fit to “remediation” in “phytoremediation.” Phytodegradation is a process where plants absorb organic pollutants and break them down into less harmful substances through metabolic processes or by releasing enzymes. It's not possible for every contaminant (for example, most? all? heavy metals) but for organic ones like Dioxins or VOCs, it can be a pretty miraculous. We'll talk more about bioremediation through fungus and bacteria in the next sections, it seems like they may be even better for this work. For example, liginolytic fungi evolved to digest tree lignin, one of the complex, tough organic polymers used by trees to make strong wood. Lignin is unusually hard to break down, and the chain of tools some of the fungis developed is so powerful it is general purpose, enabling them to break down many organic chemicals (like dioxins).

Hydraulic Control

There are other ways to utilize plants in environmental remediation. One of the big challenges of restoring contaminated land is managing the flow of groundwater below the site - many contaminants are quite stable underground, meaning they'll persist and remain dangerous for a very long time, and they can often spread and migrate with the groundwater flow. This plume can eventually contaminate wells and underground aquifers people rely on for drinking water and emerge from springs into surface water bodies.

Certain plants, such as poplar trees, can be used as natural water pumps, operating so well during their growing season that they can actually reverse the flow of groundwater.

This was used to interesting effect in this project, which used biochar to trap PFAS in groundwater, and used poplar trees to draw groundwater into that 'trap'.

It's important to note that the efficacy of these projects varies by site and it can be hard to tell why the trees seem serve as an excellent barrier in one case, and have minimal impact in others.

Other Types of Bioremediation

Fungal

arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbuscular_mycorrhiza#Phytoremediation

Bacterial

The term Bioremediation seems to apply both to the general practice of using living things to clean up contaminated sites, and specifically to using microorganisms to break down contaminants into less harmful substances. In fact, from what I've seen so far, it seems the second use-case is more common. At the very least “bioremediation <contaminant name>” has been a very useful search when I need to find research on cleaning a particular poison using bacteria.

This is an entire massive field of study with some remarkable successes to its credit. It probably deserves its own page at some point, but for now we're going to consolidate it here.

Bioremediation can be done in situ or ex situ. It seems like bioremediation is often used in situations where liquid medium has been contaminated, such as with industrial oil spills or other organic pollutants, or where a contaminant plume is spreading through groundwater.

As with plants, these microorganisms exist in and thrive in complex network of symbiosis we don't fully understand, and their performance in a given cleanup will depend strongly on whether they have the right tools to do their job. Some are provided by other bacteria, others can be provided as chemical inputs, added via the same liquid medium the bacteria is introduced through.

Bacterial bioremediation can also be used in combination with phytoextraction, such as in this example where poplar trees were used almost like biological pumps to draw in groundwater and transpirate it into the atmosphere. The trees had been inoculated with specific strains of symbiotic bacteria, known as endophytes, that would eliminate the TCE the trees absorbed from the soil and would help protect them from the toxin while doing so. The bacteria thrive on eating TCE and similar compounds, consuming the molecule’s carbon backbone and exuding chloride ions that end up as a harmless by-product in adjacent soil. The trees were soaked in a solution containing the endophyte bacterial inoculum as bare root cuttings, before being brought onsite and planted.

Microbes play pivotal roles in enhancing plant tolerance to heavy metal stress through metal solubilization, immobilization, and detoxification. Specific groups of microbes, including plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), mycorrhizal fungi, and metal-resistant bacteria, are discussed for their beneficial effects in remediation processes. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-96-4253-3_11

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479724038970

Finding Phytoremediation Options That Fit Your Story and Setting

Bioremediation/Phytoremediation are very new fields, with tons of ongoing research. Unless you go in with very specific requirements already in mind, you'll likely notice that there's an almost overwhelming number of options and variables to consider - there are hundreds of contaminants of concern, far more species that may work on them, and complex relationships where some species work on some contaminants but will be poisoned by others, or work best when supported by other species. Add to that concerns about accidentally importing invasive species and it can become quite a tangle. This isn't helped by the density of academic research language and the fact that these reports are often short on the sort of details which help when planning/writing depictions of remediation work in the field.

My workflow for finding suitable plants while not going insane

Start with the contaminant of concern. Pick your poison, then look up which plants can be used to remediate, accumulate, or stabilize it.

Wikipedia's list of known hyperaccumulators can be a start but it may also be incomplete or out of date and it focuses mostly on heavy metals. For each contaminant you can often find a review paper such as this one which will provide lists of phytoremediation species which have been tested for suitability in other studies.

You don't need to read up on how these plants work yet - some contaminants have dozens or hundreds of suitable plants so you need to narrow it down. First check each one to see if they’re native or naturalized in the region where your story is set (or decide if they’re an invasive that’s already present that might also be tolerated as part of the cleanup). Introducing an invasive or potentially-invasive species is generally a really bad idea, which makes it a hard sell in an environmental justice related story. (If your list is especially short or you really need a particular plant, consider whether its range may have moved with climate change.)

The academic papers will generally use the plants scientific name so just search for that in your search engine of choice with the word 'range' tacked on the end. Wikipedia or a plant database like Plants of the World Online will generally have a listing complete with a map. If it's listed as 'introduced' in my story's setting, I like to then search ”<plant name> invasive“ and see if it has a listing in my relevant invasive species databases (in my case https://www.naisn.org/ and https://www.invasiveplantatlas.org).

Make a shortlist of any relevant plants that seem to be effective in some way, and are native/naturalized in your region, then look more into how they work, and use that to shape the scene/setting in your story. This is a good time to look into specific scientific studies on phytoremediation with that one plant and to try to parse them as best you can.

Some plants are hyperaccumulators, meaning they take up an outsized portion of the poison into their tissues and trap it there. This is great in the short term, but they’re not destroying it, just extracting/containing it, so humans will need to remove the plants at some point. For small plants this might mean pulling them up stem and root and bagging them, while for bigger trees it could mean collecting the leaves that fall annually or even cutting them down or pollarding/coppicing them routinely to capture and remove some of the contaminant they’ve contained. It will depend on the type of plant and how they store the contaminant.

Other plants actually remediate the poison by breaking it down, or by expiating it into the air where it is exposed to sunlight and broken down, or through other biochemical processes. These are more of a set-it-and-forget-it solution.

Still others only stabilize it, holding it in place inside their roots or causing it to bind chemically to other elements and become less bioavailable. This doesn’t remove it exactly, but it might keep it contained or stop a plume of contaminant spreading underground. There are also plants like poplars which both accumulate a range of contaminants, but also drink up so much water that they can actually redirect groundwater movement.

There are so many plants, contaminants of concerns, and varying ways the two interact that it really does need some review

General details which might be useful

Bioremediation - This paper provides a detailed description and diagrams of the process of introducing bioremediation bacteria to contaminated aquifers. It includes details on the arrangement of wells for testing and remediation. The paper is about dechlorinators but it seems likely that other groundwater bioremediation projects might follow similar steps.

  1. Test the groundwater to determine the level of contamination and extent of the plume
  2. Test for the presence of suitable bioremediation bacteria (and the symbiotic bacteria which enable them). Using native bacteria already present in the groundwater is preferred. Bacteria can also be invasive.
    • If they are present, test to determine what, if any, chemical nutrients/additives/remediation would help them to thrive and work quickly
    • Biostimulation - pump the necessary solution into the aquifer
  3. If the concentration of contaminants is too high, or the right mix of dechlorinators aren’t present, they would try bioaugmentation - injecting pre-grown dechlorinator cultures along with the necessary substrate.

This older report provides some similar information.

Resources

Other concerns

Many invasive species are strong phytoremediators since they can tolerate and take in nonessential metals, as well as handle poor growing medium and climate conditions. Therefore extensive knowledge of the plant selected within the site-climate must be known

This paper suggests using biofuel crops to slowly extract some amount of heavy metals from a site, until bioavailable metals in the soil are low enough for a second phase. The idea is that even if these crops don't qualify as hyperaccumulators, as long as they take up some amount of the contaminant of concern, their commercial use would make the effort profitable enough to be worth continuing. One of the main challenges with remediation efforts in the real world is cost - there's usually no profit in remediating contaminated sites for anyone other than contractor companies doing the digging and transportation. Phytoremediation is often cheaper than the alternative, but it may still require ongoing labor such as soil and water testing, site assessments, or the harvesting of contaminated plant material. This may be of less concern in a solarpunk society where this work is better prioritized, or even where basic needs are met through systems like universal basic income, and people are more free to pursue their callings, including cleaning up damaged sites.

Detection Dogs:

https://www.washington.edu/boundless/conservation-canines/

https://aegisenvironmentalinc.com/commercial/site-investigation-scent-dog/

https://www.wsp.com/en-us/insights/meet-louie-wsps-newest-four-legged-pollution-detective#:~:text=They%20are%20trained%20to%20identify,glues%2C%20and%20dry%20cleaning%20applications