Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| writing:rough_mounding [2026/02/22 01:49] – [Similarities in Agriculture] JacobCoffinWrites | writing:rough_mounding [2026/06/26 02:28] (current) – JacobCoffinWrites | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| By contrast, rough mounding makes the land a bit less pleasant for humans - the terrain is rough, soft, and challenging to walk on, with many small climbs up and down or past the hummocks and through occasionally-wet pits. As it recovers it fills in with brush and new growth sapling trees. In some ways, it's not as intuitive as a yard or park but these aren't generally intended to be human spaces. They' | By contrast, rough mounding makes the land a bit less pleasant for humans - the terrain is rough, soft, and challenging to walk on, with many small climbs up and down or past the hummocks and through occasionally-wet pits. As it recovers it fills in with brush and new growth sapling trees. In some ways, it's not as intuitive as a yard or park but these aren't generally intended to be human spaces. They' | ||
| - | To some extent, rough mounding is part of a wider rejection of modern human landscapes. Practices like beaver dam analogs, sponge cities, and rough mounding all focus on restoring preexisting conditions and slowing the movement of water and catching it in place, allowing it to permeate the ground again. This seems to represent an acknowledgement that the continent was teeming with life balanced in complex ecologies before several hundred years of colonization tried to ' | + | To some extent, rough mounding is part of a wider rejection of modern human landscapes. Practices like beaver dam analogs, |
| ====Similarities in Agriculture==== | ====Similarities in Agriculture==== | ||
